Is a Bank Account Garnishment the Joint Account Holder's Responsibility?

Joint bank account holders might be at risk of losing their funds from a garnishment.

Joint bank account holders might be at risk of losing their funds from a garnishment.

When creditors don't receive their money in a timely fashion, they might employ more aggressive tactics to collect their debt. These tactics can include garnishing, or levying, a bank account. If the debtor is married or has a friend or family member listed on the account, the innocent party may still be at risk of losing his funds, depending on state law and the source of the money in the account.

Community Property States

Community property states and common law property states deal with marital debts differently. Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin are community property states, where all income and debts earned and incurred during the marriage are treated as equally shared by the spouses. Banks in these states will generally view that both spouses share liability in their debts, whether or not one of the spouses signed onto the debt. Funds in a joint account are subject to garnishment, regardless of which party deposited them. For example, if John and Sue have a joint checking account and Sue is the only one employed and making deposits, John's creditors can still garnish the account and take away the money Sue has deposited.

Common Law Property States

Garnishment is different for different states that use common law property distribution laws. Some of these states will not allow a creditor to garnish a joint account if one of the spouses was not individually liable on the account and the debt was not incurred for the benefit of that spouse and the family. However, other common law property states limit a creditor to only half of the funds in the account. Minnesota allows a creditor to garnish the account, but it can only keep funds that belonged to the judgment debtor; in that state, the debtor must show that part of the funds belonged to the other account holder.

Exemptions to Garnishment

The bank may not be able to take all of the money out of the account. For example, federal law bars the garnishment of Social Security payments, Supplemental Security Income, veterans benefits, federal program retirement benefits and railroad retirement benefits. State laws might also restrict the garnishment of some types of deposits, such as income from work or retirement account funds. For example, Georgia restricts the garnishment of retirement funds and a percentage of a person's paycheck. However, if the creditor is the Internal Revenue Service or a child support agency, these exemptions do not apply.

Procedures for Garnishment

If the garnishment affects exempted funds, it is the customer's responsibility to inform the bank. However, a 2011 law requires banks to review accounts for the last two months in an account subject to garnishment to protect any federal benefit deposits that were posted. If the account holder lives in a state that protects his portion of the funds in the account, he must sign forms provided by the bank and return them on time. State law may permit a person to file for an exemption with the court before the garnishment takes effect.


About the Author

Samantha Kemp is a lawyer for a general practice firm. She has been writing professionally since 2009. Her articles focus on legal issues, personal finance, business and education. Kemp acquired her JD from the University of Arkansas School of Law. She also has degrees in economics and business and teaching.

Photo Credits

  • Ryan McVay/Photodisc/Getty Images